Reyelts V Lon Smith Roofing

The gist of the case is that lon smith s signed contract with gerald and beatriz reyelts promised to make all arrangements with the reyelts insurance company to pay for a new roof.

Reyelts v lon smith roofing.

The reyelts relied upon the lon smith defendants representations that the work the lon smith defendants promised to perform and allegedly performed was actually performed. S soon thereafter a representative of lon smith roofing and construction personally. S soon thereafter a representative of lon smith roofing and construction personally visited the homeowners offering their roofing services including an assessment of the hail damage and assistance with the insurance claim. Due to her age and physical limitations beatriz could not and thus did not climb onto the roof to inspect the lon smith defendants work.

Lon smith roofing and construction et al a home sustained hail damage during a may 2011 storm. Lon smith roofing and construction et al. The reyeltses filed suit against lon smith associates inc. And a 1 systems inc d b a lon smith roofing and construction its owner cary jay cross and its retained debt collector cary j.

The problems for lon smith roofing started with the 2013 ruling in reyelts v. Lon smith roofing and construction et al a home sustained hail damage during a may 2011 storm. The lon smith appellants ignore the language of their roof repair contract with the appelleesgerald and beatriz reyelts the reyelts whichspecifically authorize d lon smith roofing and construction lsrc to pursue homeowner s best interest for all repairs at a price agreeable to the insurance company and lsrc. The reyelts relied upon the lon smith defendants representations that the work the lon smith defendants promised to perform and allegedly performed was actually performed.

The problems for lon smith roofing started with the. A decision adverse to lon smith roofing could have widespread ramifications for all texas contractors who attempt to negotiate insurance claims. The lon smith appellants ignore the language of their roof repair contract with the appellees gerald and beatriz reyelts the reyelts which specifically authorize d lon smith roofing and construction lsrc to pursue homeowner s best interest for all repairs at a price agreeable to the insurance company and lsrc the contract further stated that t he final price agreed to between the insurance company and lsrc shall be the final contract price in other.